On 04/02/2015 09:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 04/02/2015 10:40 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> So, max_align_t is an object type, and therefore malloc returns a >> pointer suitable for max_align_t. > > Then the GCC definition of max_align_t is incorrect, it should be 8 on > x86_64 GNU/Linux, because traditionally, that's what mallocs implement > for this architecture. (dlmalloc in glibc is an exception.)
Or the libcs are wrong; one or the other. Andrew.
