On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> Though, 5.0 milestone isn't completely meaningless, it means plan to fix it >>> already before the release. >> >> That's true for all 5.1 milestone bugs as well. :-) > > It would be "fix during development aka stage1-3" vs. "fix for 5.1" > which we'd use > during stage4 (where we also forgot to bump the patchlevel version to get > trunk > to GCC 5.0.1 as documented).
Which means the target milestone should be 6.0 while trunk is still 5.0.x and 6.0.1 while trunk is 6.0.0 and 6.1.0 while trunk is 6.0.1 and 6.2.0 while the gcc-6-branch is 6.1.1. Maybe that's too much continuous renaming? Richard. > > Richard. > >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de >> GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 >> "And now for something completely different."
