On 09/09/2014 06:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
error-prone
(not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current
(crippled)
version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.
But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't
make sense to split them off as separate job. I think we don't need 100%
even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable.
You mean enhancing the script to split across arbitrarily long prefixes?
That would be great.
-Y
