On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > <bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am having few issues replacing op in c_expr. >> I thought of following possibilities: >> >> a) create a new vec<cpp_token> vector new_code. >> for each token in code >> { >> if token.type is not CPP_NAME >> new_code.safe_push (token); >> else >> { >> cpp_token new_token = >> ??? create new token of type CPP_NAME >> with contents as name of operator ??? >> } >> } >> >> I tried to go this way, but am stuck with creating a new token type. >> i started by: >> cpp_token new_token = token; // get same attrs as token. >> CPP_HASHNODE (new_token.val.node.node)->ident.str = name of operator. >> CPP_HASHNODE (new_token.val.node.node)->ident.len = len of operator name. >> name of operator is obtained from opers[i] in parse_for. >> >> however this does not work because I guess >> new_token = token, shallow copies >> the token (default assignment operator, i didn't find an overloaded version). >> >> b) create new struct c_expr_elem and use >> vec<c_expr_elem> code, instead of vec<cpp_token> code; >> >> sth like: >> struct c_expr_elem >> { >> enum c_expr_elem_type { ID, TOKEN }; >> enum c_expr_elem_type type; >> >> union { >> cpp_token token; >> const char *id; >> }; >> }; >> >> while replacing op, compare token with op, and if it matches, >> create a new c_expr_elem with type = ID, and id = name of operator. >> This shall probably work, but shall require many changes to other parts >> since we change c_expr::code. >> >> I would like to hear any other suggestions. > > Together with the vector of tokens recorded at parse_c_expr time > record a vector of token mappings (op -> plus, op2 -> ...) and do > the replacement at code-generation time where we also special-case > captures. > > Yeah, it's a but unfortunate that c_expr parsing is done the way it > is done.... Thanks. I guess we would require a multi-map for this since there can be many operators (op -> [plus, minus], op2 -> [negate]) ? Unfortunately, I somehow seem to have missed your response and ended up with a hackish way of doing it, although it works. I will soon change that to use token mappings.
I mostly followed b), except i made it sub-class of cpp_token, so the other code using c_expr::code (outline_c_expr, c_expr::gen_transform) did not require changes except for special-casing op. * genmatch.c (c_expr::elem): New struct. (c_expr::code): Change type to vec<c_expr::elem>. (replace_op_in_c_expr): New function. (c_expr::gen_transform): Adjust to changes in c_expr. (outline_c_expr): Likewise. (parse_c_expr): Likewise. (parse_for): Call replace_op_in_c_expr. Thanks, Prathamesh > > Richard. > >> Thanks, >> Prathamesh.
Index: genmatch.c =================================================================== --- genmatch.c (revision 213343) +++ genmatch.c (working copy) @@ -238,11 +238,20 @@ struct expr : public operand struct c_expr : public operand { - c_expr (cpp_reader *r_, vec<cpp_token> code_, unsigned nr_stmts_) + struct elem: public cpp_token + { + enum elem_type { TOKEN, ID }; + enum elem_type type; + const char *id; + + elem (enum elem_type type_ = TOKEN, const char *id_ = 0): type (type_), id (id_) {} + }; + + c_expr (cpp_reader *r_, vec<elem> code_, unsigned nr_stmts_) : operand (OP_C_EXPR), r (r_), code (code_), nr_stmts (nr_stmts_), fname (NULL) {} cpp_reader *r; - vec<cpp_token> code; + vec<elem> code; unsigned nr_stmts; char *fname; virtual void gen_transform (FILE *f, const char *, bool); @@ -641,6 +650,31 @@ replace_id (operand *o, const char *user return ne; } + +operand * +replace_op_in_c_expr (operand *o, const char *user_id, const char *oper) +{ + gcc_assert (is_a<c_expr *> (o)); + c_expr *ce = as_a<c_expr *> (o); + + vec<c_expr::elem> code = vNULL; + + for (unsigned i = 0; i < ce->code.length (); ++i) + { + cpp_token token = ce->code[i]; + if (token.type == CPP_NAME + && strcmp ((const char *) NODE_NAME (token.val.node.node), user_id) == 0) + { + e_operation operation (oper); + c_expr::elem elm (c_expr::elem::ID, operation.op->id); + code.safe_push (elm); + } + else + code.safe_push (ce->code[i]); + } + + return new c_expr (ce->r, code, ce->nr_stmts); +} void check_no_user_id (operand *o) @@ -742,6 +776,11 @@ c_expr::gen_transform (FILE *f, const ch for (unsigned i = 0; i < code.length (); ++i) { + if (code[i].type == elem::ID) + { + fputs (code[i].id, f); + continue; + } const cpp_token *token = &code[i]; /* Replace captures for code-gen. */ @@ -1717,6 +1756,11 @@ outline_c_exprs (FILE *f, struct operand unsigned stmt_nr = 1; for (unsigned i = 0; i < e->code.length (); ++i) { + if (e->code[i].type == c_expr::elem::ID) + { + fputs (e->code[i].id, f); + continue; + } const cpp_token *token = &e->code[i]; /* Replace captures for code-gen. */ @@ -1972,7 +2016,7 @@ parse_c_expr (cpp_reader *r, cpp_ttype s const cpp_token *token; cpp_ttype end; unsigned opencnt; - vec<cpp_token> code = vNULL; + vec<c_expr::elem> code = vNULL; unsigned nr_stmts = 0; eat_token (r, start); if (start == CPP_OPEN_PAREN) @@ -1997,7 +2041,7 @@ parse_c_expr (cpp_reader *r, cpp_ttype s nr_stmts++; /* Record the token. */ - code.safe_push (*token); + code.safe_push (*(c_expr::elem *) token); } while (1); return new c_expr (r, code, nr_stmts); @@ -2134,10 +2178,20 @@ parse_for (cpp_reader *r, source_locatio { simplify *s = for_simplifiers[j]; operand *match_op = replace_id (s->match, user_id, opers[i]); - operand *result_op = replace_id (s->result, user_id, opers[i]); + + operand *result_op; + if (is_a<c_expr *> (s->result)) + result_op = replace_op_in_c_expr (s->result, user_id, opers[i]); + else + result_op = replace_id (s->result, user_id, opers[i]); + + + vec<operand *> ifexpr_vec = vNULL; + for (unsigned k = 0; k < s->ifexpr_vec.length (); ++k) + ifexpr_vec.safe_push (replace_op_in_c_expr (s->ifexpr_vec[k], user_id, opers[i])); simplify *ns = new simplify (s->name, match_op, s->match_location, - result_op, s->result_location, s->ifexpr_vec); + result_op, s->result_location, ifexpr_vec); simplifiers.safe_push (ns); }