Hi Mircea, thank you for your comment! I wanted to say, that this AST-like representation is an ISL AST containing only loops, conditions, and statements (basic blocks). It will be differ from a CLooG AST in representation of AST and, possibly, additional options of ISL AST generation.
I'll try to eliminate this ambiguity in an improved version of the proposal. 2014-03-17 21:47 GMT+06:00 Mircea Namolaru <mircea.namol...@inria.fr>: > Hi, > > First, I fully agree that integration of the ISL code generator into Graphite > will be an > important step forward for Graphite development. > > Regarding the implementation I have a question - why a new AST-like > representation is needed ? > It is not possible to generate the code directly from the ISL AST (with > possible addition of > new attributes/transformations) ? > > Regards, Mircea > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Roman Gareev" <gareevro...@gmail.com> >> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org >> Cc: "Tobias Grosser" <tob...@grosser.es>, "Albert Cohen" >> <albert.co...@inria.fr>, "Mircea Namolaru" >> <mircea.namol...@inria.fr> >> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 9:18:40 PM >> Subject: Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite >> >> Dear gcc contributors, >> >> I am going to try to participate in Google Summer of Code 2014. My project >> is "Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite". >> >> My proposal can be found at on the following link >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Wloo-931AoTWlkMzRobmZKT1U/edit?usp=sharing. >> I would be very grateful for your comments, feedback and ideas about >> its >> improvement. >> >> P.S. Sorry for the copy of this message, the previous one was declined by >> the MAILER-DAEMON. >> >> - >> >> Roman Gareev >> -- Cheers, Roman Gareev.
