On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:11:43PM -0700, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, lin zuojian <manjian2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I read LLVM code for a while,and a question raise:Whose scheduler is
> > better?
> > LLVM brings in the DAG,and make it look important just like IR or
> > MachineInst.But is that necessary?I don't see what kind of problem
> > it tries to solve.
> > From the pipeline of the compiler, LLVM can not do sched2.Is that
> > suck?
>
> I clearly can't speak for GCC developers, but as an LLVM developer I
> have to say, this seems like a (somewhat rudely phrased) question for
> the LLVM mailing lists where there are people more familiar with the
> LLVM internals. Happy to reply in more depth there (or here if folks
> are actually interested).
Hi,
I just ask for opinions.I think many GCC developers do familiar with
the opponent.If I ask in the LLVM mailing list, I have to worry
about If they are familiar with GCC, too(what's sched2 pass?).
--
Regards
lin zuojian
