On 20 February 2014 18:16, Patrick Palka wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 20 February 2014 15:31, Patrick Palka wrote: >>> (I counted nearly 100 (non-debug) >>> functions that could be made static in gcc, and 4 in libstdc++, by the >>> way.) >> >> Which were the four in libstdc++? >> >> I only see __gslice_on_index and __concat_size_t. > > Those two along with _Rb_tree_rotate_left and _Rb_tree_rotate_right.
See the comments above those functions. (That mistake shouldn't happen again, because we have the check-abi test to catch it.)
