On 19 February 2014 23:19, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: > With the unified assembly format, you should not need those > .arm/.thumb and in fact emitting them can make things even worse.
If only we could get rid or all pre-UAL inline assembly on the planet... :) The has been the only reason why we added support for those in our assembler, because GAS supports them and people still use (or have legacy code they won't change). If the binutils folks (and you guys) are happy to start seriously de-phasing pre-UAL support, I'd be more than happy to do so on our end. Do you think I should start that conversation on the binutils list? Maybe a new serious compulsory warning, to start? cheers, --renato
