> On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:26 AM, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Wrong list, please send any follow-ups to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org only. > >> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, Lars Hagström wrote: >> >> I'm wondering whether GCC 4.9 will switch to -std=gnu++11 as default? > > No. This is asked regularly, google should find the answer easily.
Considering GCC has not switched to c99 by default what makes someone think GCC should switch to c++11 by default? -- Andrew > >> I got an error that implies that "auto" is not usable, which would >> mean that C++11 is not enabled, but I also got a warning that implied >> that gnu++11 is "enabled by default". >> >>> error: ‘xdir’ does not name a type >> >>> warning: non-static data member initializers only available with -std=c++11 >>> or -std=gnu++11 [enabled by default] >> >> Or does the "enabled by default" bit mean something other than I think it >> means? > > It is the warning that is enabled by default (in other messages you would see > [-Wunused] or [-Wformat] etc to tell you which option controls this warning). > > -- > Marc Glisse
