On 12/18/2013 08:08 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
<bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com> wrote:
Would it be better to include tree.h instead of tree-core.h (tree.h
includes tree-core.h anyway), or shall I leave these macros untouched
?
Better leave these macros intact for now. We are trying to flatten out
the #include tree. Adding tree.h to another header goes in the
opposite direction.
Please add a note describing the conflict.
Looks like function.c is the primary user of {ADD,SUB}_PARM_SIZE, with
a single use of ADD_PARM_SIZE in calls.c I'd suggest moving both new
functions to function.c and exporting the protoype for add_parm_size()
in function.h. calls.c already include function.h.
I can't imagine that call to ADD_PARM_SIZE in calls.c having much impact
on compile time...
Andrew
