On 11/26/2013 06:38 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?I believe it was on the microblaze where someone broke the libgcc pattern for rtems by changing the pattern from XXX*-*-* to XXX*-*-elf.
Correct. microblaze-rtems* is incomplete in libgcc. I have a patch pending for gcc-4.8.x, but haven't yet tried with gcc-4.9.x. Ralf