On 11/26/2013 06:38 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:

Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already
covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?

I believe it was on the microblaze where someone broke the
libgcc pattern for rtems by changing the pattern from
XXX*-*-* to XXX*-*-elf.
Correct. microblaze-rtems* is incomplete in libgcc.

I have a patch pending for gcc-4.8.x, but haven't yet tried with
gcc-4.9.x.

Ralf


Reply via email to