On 26 November 2013 14:51, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-26 06:33:39 -0600, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> > wrote:
>> Was microblaze-rtems attempted? I would have expected a failure like >> these if so. > > No, it wasn't. It's not on the list of targets in > .../gcc/contrib/config-list.mk . So we'd probably add that to the > target list I guess? I'll propose a patch later tonight (adding to > another pending patch to config-list.mk) The idea if config-list.mk is not to build every conceivable target configuration, but to give a reasonable converage of the different target architectures and OS/library configurations so that you can effectively test a patch with unknown target-specific impact. Is there something that microblaze-rtems exposes that is not already covered by other microblaze or rtems targets that are already included?
