On 11/05/13 03:11, Yury Gribov wrote:
> If you're referring to mudflap (Frank Eigler's work),
> ...
> It never reached a point where interoperability across objects with
and without mudflap instrumentation worked
Jeff,
Could you add more details? E.g. I don't see how mudflap
interoperability is different from AdressSanitizer which seems to be
state of the art.
I haven't looked at AddressSanitizer, so I can't really comment on
if/how it handles code interoperability.
I would recommend reviewing the work Intel is doing on MPX.
jeff
