On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Longer term... the BE will not be calling into gimplify at all.. it will be > purely a front end thing. As direct tree access vanishes, the optimizers > will be forced to generate gimple directly, as they should. Right. Which is the routines in gimplify. I was under the impression that you were proposing to move all the gimple generation routines to gimplify. Or is it only the routines that convert FE trees to gimple? If the latter, then my earlier suggestion makes no sense. Diego.
