> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew MacLeod [mailto:amacl...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:14 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jeff Law > Subject: Re: Question about a fix for PR 58925 > > On 10/31/2013 12:05 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andrew MacLeod [mailto:amacl...@redhat.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:44 AM > >> To: Iyer, Balaji V > >> Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jeff Law > >> Subject: Re: Question about a fix for PR 58925 > >> > >> on a related note, is there something I have to do to make the > >> compiler bootstrap on x86_64? > >> > >> on x86_64 I checked out a fresh branch this morning, and my bootstrap > >> fails trying to configure cilk runtime. It was doing it yesterday to > >> me when I updated, so I tried a fresh checkout this morning.. same thing. > >> > >> its actually just configured pretty blandly on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu... > >> /gcc/2013-10-31/gcc/configure --verbose > >> --prefix=/gcc/2013-10-31/install > >> > > That should just work. Let me look into this and get back to you. It > bootstrapped for me correctly yesterday. > > > > Jakub says it does for him too... So Im not sure what he scoop is. > And it turns out it does work on a different x86 box I have. > This is a pretty vanilla fedora 18.. huh. I'll keep poking, especially now > that i > have aworking version I can compare the config.log files >
I have tried it on my Ubuntu and Suse machine. Both seem to work fine. Let me see if I can track down a Fedora machine...
