Re: proposal to make SIZE_TYPE more flexible

[DJ Delorie]

So, given all that, is there any way to add the "target-specific
size_t" portion without waiting for-who-knows-how-long for the intN_t
and enum-size-type projects to finish?  Some form of interim API that
we can put in, so that we can start working on finding all the
assumptions about size_t, while waiting for the rest to finish?