> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:15 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill
> (ja...@redhat.com)
> Subject: Re: Cilk Library
> 
> On 10/16/13 13:30, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> >> First, the all issues Joseph mentioned need to be addressed.  So
> >> first, you need to ensure it's only being built on x86/x86_64 given
> >> the asms and bring together some documentation as to what's needed to
> port the
> >> runtime system to other architectures.   Closely related, I think you
> >> initially need to ensure it only builds on x86-linux platforms --
> >> unless you've already verified it works properly on one or more of
> >> the bsd platforms, solaris, windows, etc.
> >>
> >
> > We are in the process of addressing all these. I will send out an email 
> > with the
> fixed runtime as soon as I can.
> Excellent.  THanks.
> 
> 
> >> I would strongly echo Joseph's recommendation to ensure that only
> >> those symbols specifically intended to be part of the public
> >> interface are exported from the shared library. How stable has the exported
> API/ABI
> >> for Cilk+ been?    Related: how clean is the RTS from a compile-time
> >> namespace pollution standpoint.  For C++ is everything in a
> >> namespace, for C is everything prefixed appropriately?
> >>
> >
> > We are currently verifying those and making sure only the required symbols
> are exported.
> IMHO, the best way to do this is with linker scripts and it's an excellent 
> time ot
> drop in versioning information.  I'd think this would be useful for ICC as 
> well.
> This is probably the biggest issue.  I'll note Richi chimed in on this as 
> well.
> 
Yup we have implemented versioning. Also, we have just completed all the things 
that Joseph Myers mentioned and are in the process of testing it. I will send 
out a revised patch this week itself.

> Look at libatomic/libatomic.map and how that gets used.  It gives you full
> control over the exports.
> 
> jeff

Reply via email to