On 09/12/2013 03:22 AM, Víctor Martínez wrote: > Why is sjlj.o the only one built for armv4 while the rest of objects are > armv5t? > Is this behaviour expected? Or is there something wrong trying to configure > gcc > with these options?
There are co-processor instructions in there that can't be encoded with thumb1, as present on armv5t. It is as expected. r~
