On 07/08/2013 07:33 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > I strongly disagree. We (GCC) are at fault here. We implicitly > enable a feature at configure time without knowing its builds > will succeed (despite having repeated reports that it does often > fail) without much input from the builder (who might be ignorant of > real reason of failures.)
That's better than silently disable multilib builds so that the user doesn't know until the build is complete. It's better to abort early. Andrew.
