Little more information:
>From lreg:
[..]
(insn 31 30 44 0 0x2aaaacf51000 (set (mem/s:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI 884)
(symbol_ref:SI ("acpi_lr_stat"))) [7427 sec 0 space 0,
cmsmode 0 S8 A64])
(const_int 0 [0x0])) 67 {*movdi} (insn_list 26 (nil))
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 884)
(nil)))
[..]
>From greg:
(insn 31 30 325 0 0x2aaaacf51000 (set (reg:DI 56 r56)
(const_int 0 [0x0])) 67 {*movdi} (insn_list 26 (nil))
(nil))
(insn 325 31 44 0 (nil) (set (mem/s:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI 58 r58 [884])
(symbol_ref:SI ("acpi_lr_stat"))) [7427 sec 0 space 0,
cmsmode 0 S8 A64])
(reg:DI 56 r56)) 67 {*movdi} (nil)
(nil))
- Hendrik Greving
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Hendrik Greving
<hendrik.greving.in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I'm running into
>
> /* Figure out which alternative currently matches. */
> if (! constrain_operands (1))
> fatal_insn_not_found (insn);
>
> 'insn does not satisfy its constraints'
>
> By the way, the instruction is
>
> (insn 325 31 44 0 (nil) (set (mem/s:DI (plus:SI (reg:SI 58 r58 [884])
> (symbol_ref:SI ("acpi_lr_stat"))) [7427 sec 0 space 0,
> cmsmode 0 S8 A64])
> (reg:DI 56 r56)) 67 {*movdi} (nil)
> (nil))
>
>
> Asking abstractly, does this mean that I need to support more
> constraints in movdi, or does it mean that reload did something wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> - Hendrik
