On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:59 PM, reed kotler <rkot...@mips.com> wrote: > On 05/02/2013 07:54 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:44 PM, reed kotler <rkot...@mips.com> wrote: >>> >>> Should a return statement be emitted in a function that has the naked >>> attribute. >> >> I vote yes. > > why would you want that? naked functions are just inline asm. > you can generate your own return statement. > > I meant to end that statement with a question mark. :) > >>> There seems to be some confusion here and apparently disagreement between >>> various >>> gcc compilers. >> >> Which targets do not generate a return instruction for a naked function? > > I don't think that any that support naked functions emit a return > instruction.
Well, if they all agree, then clearly that is what we should do. But you said there was some confusion. To what were you referring? Ian
