On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: >> On 2013-03-28 07:57 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >>> >>> Does gengetype works with inheritance now? I could not >>> find anything to that effect in the documentation. >>> >> No. The plan is to get rid of gengtype by implementing manual markers >> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-conversion/gc-alternatives). But those plans >> are just plans for now. > > Eh - in fact you _promised_ to do that in trade for accepting the C++ > conversion! > Never trust promises from google ... *sigh* > > Now we are in the exact situation I was feared about - people will start > hacking around the C++ gengtype limitations in various ways instead of > doing it properly (because "those plans are just plans"). > > :/
I am all for getting rid or genotype if that is the long term plan. Some of the work I was planning on the C++ front-end would have benefited from inheritance. Richard, I don't I am hacking around C++ gengtype limitations. -- Gaby
