On 03/07/2013 08:23 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 07/03/2013 16:55, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 03/07/2013 02:09 PM, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On 06/03/2013 16:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> >>>> If no new P1 appears within a week, >>> I may be about to file one. What priority would "Java doesn't compile on >>> a >>> secondary platform" count as? There's a trivial bug in libffi and I already >>> posted a patch(*) to both -patches and upstream, but am waiting for a >>> response. >> >> Anthony approved it already on Feb 21. > > Ah, I may have missed a point there. Does AG's approval apply to gcc's copy > of libffi?
Yes. > He said he thought I should commit to gcc/libffi independently, but > I thought I would need someone else's approval for that. I see now > that there is no gcc-specific libffi maintainer listed in > MAINTAINERS, so I should just go ahead and commit? Either Anthony or I review libffi patches in gcc. The other thing that happens is that the back-end maintainers sometimes review libffi patches because those maintainers are the most knowledgeable. You're not going to get any more reviews. Andrew.
