Hello Diego,
There still appears to be an issue with the vec.h changes, the
detailed memory stats are not very informative. The allocation lines
are shown in vec.h without further details:
t8000.log:vec.h:1268 ((null)) 0:
0.0% 40 4: 0.0%
t8000.log:vec.h:1263 ((null)) 0:
0.0% 327440 73: 0.0%
t8000.log:vec.h:1255 ((null)) 0:
0.0% 720880 6579: 0.6%
t8000.log:vec.h:1260 ((null)) 754680:
9.6% 12634104 729374:71.2%
t8000.log:vec.h:1264 ((null))
1089176:13.9% 32381804 151514:14.8%
t8000.log:vec.h:1215 ((null))
5997120:76.5% 38899664 136293:13.3%
t8000.log:vec.h:758 ((null)) 0:
0.0% 0: 0.0% 40: 0.0% 0: 0.0% 1
t8000.log:vec.h:674 ((null)) 787240:
0.2% 1872: 0.0% 0: 0.0% 1024: 0.1% 8076
t8000.log:vec.h:746 ((null)) 7312448:
1.5% 3504304: 4.0% 3396880: 5.2% 7168: 0.5% 180222
t8000.log:vec.h:694 ((null)) 8388800:
1.7% 12585720:14.4% 4194400: 6.4% 1080: 0.1% 69
t8000.log:vec.h:706 ((null)) 22612928:
4.7% 1572664: 1.8% 4194304: 6.4% 1136: 0.1% 41
t8000.log:vec.h:652 ((null))
67125296:13.8% 33562640:38.4% 0: 0.0% 64: 0.0%
4
Is this a known issue?
Ciao!
Steven
