On 12/13/2012 04:53 PM, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Quoting Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsep...@googlemail.com>:

On 12/12/2012 08:54 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:
On 12/12/2012 2:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:

And as usual: If you use an almost 30 years old architecture, why
would you need the latest-and-greatest compiler technology?
Seriously...

Well the embedded folk often end up with precisely this dichotomy :-)
But if no sign of 386 embedded chips, then reasonable to deprecate

I've never heard about them before, nor do I know how far spread their
products are, however these folks seem to be producing i386-SoCs
http://www.dmp.com.tw/
esp. this one
http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/vortex86sx/

I am not 100% sure, but from looking at the documents on that page I
think it is based on the i486 rather than on the i386.

Neither am I ;)

My impression (although I am not quite up to date with the current
situation) is that many (most?) x86 CPUs used in smaller embedded
systems are i48&/i586 hybrids, i.e. they are i486-compatible and
also supports some (but not all) features of the i586.

No idea, on http://www.dmp.com.tw/tech/vortex86sx/faq.htm#3001
they are telling the Vortex86sx doesn't have an FPU, while the "upcoming Vortex86dx" would have one.

Ralf

Reply via email to