On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 15:12 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/07/2012 03:08 PM, Oleg Endo wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 14:59 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 11/07/2012 02:47 PM, Oleg Endo wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> In PR 24129 we've got a test case that originated from some BSD licensed > >>> code. Is it OK to add this test case 1:1 into the c torture tests? > >>> Or is a disclaimer required such as found in > >>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr20527-1.c ? > >> Ideally the test would be reduced to its minimal form; at that point its > >> copyright status would be re-evaluated. > >> > > > > I'm sorry, the PR in question is 48806. 24129 is the attachment ID: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24129 > > > > Do you think that this needs further reduction, or would it be > > sufficient to rename the func/var names and reformat it? > I think it's borderline as-is. > > I suspect there's quite a bit of junk that can be zapped from that test.
OK, thanks for your feedback. I'll have a closer look at it and post a patch if I can successfuly reduce it further. Cheers, Oleg
