On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:34:15 +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >> >> Say, why don't we reserve GCC 5.0 for the first version that gets rid of >> reload? Then let's see if we can get there while the X in 4.X is still in >> single digits! > > (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg01103.html) > > I suppose LRA counts, even if it doesn't get rid of reload completely just > yet. > > Bump the number! :-)
Also the fact that GCC is now written in C++ seems to me to be deserving of a bump to 5.0. So now we have two reasons! Ian
