On Oct 29, 2012 1:54 PM, "Perry Smith" wrote: > > My original logic in adding them to libstdc++.a is they are only used > (called) by code automatically produced by g++ and not gcc.
That doesn't make sense. Both gcc and g++ are just driver programs that invoke the appropriate compiler program, which for C++ is cc1plus. So C++ code can be compiled by gcc, and doesn't necessarily link to libstdc++. Putting the files in libsupc++ might make sense but libstdc++ is definitely wrong.
