On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> It looks like something is wrong with the CFG: >> >> | >> 19 (COLD) >> / \ >> / \ >> 20 (COLD) 21 (COLD) >> \ / >> \ / >> 22 (HOT) > > So the partitioning is messed up, the above makes no sense. Where does > it come from? > > >> I understand; the problem is that I am not allowed to publish the >> input code leading to this situation :-( > > SPEC GAP is maybe not GPL, I don't know. But the "official" GAP is > GPLv2 so you may be able to produce a test case from that code base > instead. The problem is that this bug only triggers with some profile > data, but you could attach gcda/gcno files to a PR.
The official wording from SPEC is that the sources are under the same license as they are provided to them. It is the data files which are under the SPEC license. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
