Is someone going to apply this patch?
Thanks, David
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Sharad Singhai <sing...@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> ../../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c: In function 'void
>> rs6000_density_test(rs6000_cost_data*)':
>> ../../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c:3550:32: error: 'dump_kind_p'
>> was not declared in this scope
>>
>> This is due to:
>>
>> 2012-10-24 Sharad Singhai <singhai at google dot com>
>>
>> * dumpfile.c (dump_enabled_p): Make it inline and move the definition
>> to dumpfile.h.
>> (dump_kind_p): Deleted. Functionality replaced by dump_enabled_p.
>> Make alt_dump_file extern.
>> * dumpfile.h (dump_enabled_p): Move inline definition here.
>> (dump_kind_p): Delete declaration.
>> ...
>>
>> It's kinda nice to check target code as well when changing things... ;-)
>
> Sorry about that. Will do so in future.
>
>> Is the change at the bottom of this email correct?
>
> Yes, that is correct. If there are any more instances of dump_kind_p
> (), they should be replaced by dump_enabled_p () as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Sharad
>
>>
>> Ciao!
>> Steven
>>
>>
>> Index: config/rs6000/rs6000.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 192780)
>> +++ config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy)
>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@ rs6000_density_test (rs6000_cost_data *data)
>> && vec_cost + not_vec_cost > DENSITY_SIZE_THRESHOLD)
>> {
>> data->cost[vect_body] = vec_cost * (100 + DENSITY_PENALTY) / 100;
>> - if (dump_kind_p (MSG_NOTE))
>> + if (dump_enabled_p ())
>> dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
>> "density %d%%, cost %d exceeds threshold,
>> penalizing "
>> "loop body cost by %d%%", density_pct,
