On 30 August 2012 13:43, Nikos Fotoulis wrote: > Hi. > > The cxx-conversion idea does not come without its > cons. The most important for us is that there will > not be a plain gcc-core package that is smaller,
The GCC project doesn't make gcc-core tarballs any more anyway. Third-party packagers are still free to provide a separate package that doesn't include g++ and the C++ standard library headers, the language the code is written in doesn't greatly affect how the end result is packaged.
