On 21 August 2012 09:20, PARAT Didier wrote:
>
> Thanks, but how come nobody noticed that some of these tests
> (gcc.dg/pr27528.c and some others) needed the line
> { dg-options "-O0" } instead of { dg-options "" } ?Probably because they're not failing for most people, see e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-08/msg02023.html
