On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> > Prototype below - fire away on bikeshedding names.
>>
>> Make it mirror the preprocessor names that people are used to, and do away
>> with the _loc_: __builtin_FILE, __builtin_FUNCTION, __builtin_LINE.
>
> Hm, well. The following includes documentation and the old new names,
> __builtin_file_location, etc.
This looks good too me.
A few points to consider:
* relation of __builtin_function_location to C99 (and C++11) __func__
* Do we want to update libcpp to systematically expand __FILE__ to
__builtin_file_location, etc?
It general, it might be good to avoid too many ways of spelling the same
thing.
> I'll wait a bit to settle on the name issue ;)
:-)
I am not going there :-)
-- Gaby
