On Jun 28, 2012, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, this found a bug in both gcc and clang (or in the > itanium ABI, it is not very clear). The testcase is not well-formed C++, for it violates the one-definition rule in that it *lacks* a definition for the virtual member function foo::~foo(). Does it make any difference if you add a definition? -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
