Hi,
maybe it makes sense to look at some test suite comments since now all non EABI
configurations have been removed (is this correct?).
The problem was pointed out here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00950.html
Here are some samples of the test suite (4.8-20120617):
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/vaarg2.C:// { dg-options "-Wno-abi" {
target arm_eabi } }
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm1.C:// { dg-do compile { target
arm*-*-eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm2.C:// { dg-do compile { target
arm*-*-*eabi* arm*-*-symbianelf* } }
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/arm3.C:// { dg-do compile { target
arm*-*-*eabi* } }
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/arm_va_list.C:// { dg-require-effective-target
arm_eabi }
Does it make sense to replace all "arm*-*-eabi*", "arm*-*-*eabi*", and
"arm*-*-symbianelf*" combinations with "arm_eabi"?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
