On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Cary Coutant <ccout...@google.com> wrote: >> We only have very few bits to in STB_XXX field. > > This is exactly why I'm not in favor of this extension. The feature > doesn't seem compelling enough to use up one of these precious > reserved values (in fact, you're using the next-to-last one that's > reserved for OS use). > > You want a backup definition? Put a weak def at the end of the link line. >
It doesn't work for us since the backup definition is always used even if there is a normal definition in a shared library or an archive. -- H.J.
