On 12 April 2012 22:53, Xinliang David Li wrote: > yes .. Excellent, thanks, and thanks for the link to the pdf, I hadn't seen it before and GCC does do pretty poorly with those examples.
> thanks, > > David > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 12 April 2012 22:32, Xinliang David Li wrote: >>> Thanks for preparing the wiki page. I have looked at the examples from >>> this slide: http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/events/GoingNative12/GN12Clang.pdf >>> with trunk gcc. In some cases, gcc's warning matches that of clang but >>> in majority of cases, gcc either emits no warnings or worse ones. The >>> warnings in the comments are from clang. One possible advantage of >>> clang is that adding new warnings is relatively easier. >> >> Noone will add them to GCC unless someone requests them. You're in >> the process of creating bugzilla reports for those issues, right?
