On 12 April 2012 22:53, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> yes ..

Excellent, thanks, and thanks for the link to the pdf, I hadn't seen
it before and GCC does do pretty poorly with those examples.


> thanks,
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> On 12 April 2012 22:32, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> Thanks for preparing the wiki page. I have looked at the examples from
>>> this slide: http://ecn.channel9.msdn.com/events/GoingNative12/GN12Clang.pdf
>>> with trunk gcc. In some cases, gcc's warning matches that of clang but
>>> in majority of cases, gcc either emits no warnings or worse ones. The
>>> warnings in the comments are from clang.  One possible advantage of
>>> clang is that adding new warnings is relatively easier.
>>
>> Noone will add them to GCC unless someone requests them.  You're in
>> the process of creating bugzilla reports for those issues, right?

Reply via email to