On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 April 2012 16:33, Robert Dewar wrote: >> >> For warnings you put a higher number to get more warnings. Yes, >> you may find that you get too many warnings and they are not >> useful. Remedy: reduce the number after -W :-) > > It would even allow -Winf for the > sometimes-requested-but-probably-not-actually-useful > -Wreally-really-all that turns on *all* possible warnings. Or > -Wover9000.
Do we have bugzilla entry for that? -- Gaby
