On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: >> Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 04/04/2012 03:56 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>>> Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 04/04/2012 10:44 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >>>>>> For GCC-4.8, I would like to turn on -Wall by default. >>>>>> Comments? >>>>> >>>>> Umm, should this really happen at exactly the same time as C++ >>>>> by default? >>>> >>>> I assume that Gaby is talking about making -Wall the default for users >>>> of GCC. >>> >>> Oh, wow. Really? That's a big change. Time to be brave, I guess, >>> but I very much like the idea of a gcc that does just what it's told; >>> making -Wall the default is a big break with tradition. >> >> Yes, that would be a big change. > > At the same time we should make 'gcc' optimize as every other compiler. > Thus, default to -O2.
Which goes back to what I said earlier: it is "does what it is told". - Gaby
