On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, David Malcolm wrote: > Presumably a fix would be for the plugin's configuration phase to have a > test that tries to build a test plugin and run it, first building with a > C compiler, then a C++ compiler, and decides what compiler the real > plugin should be built with accordingly.
We've previously discussed providing some generic configure / build support for plugins (standard autoconf macros intended for use in a plugin's build system, for example). If in future plugins are supported on Windows hosts (or any other hosts that lack a -rdynamic equivalent) then such generic support will be increasingly useful because of the need to link plugins on such hosts against a shared library or libraries that contain most of GCC. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
