On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:23 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If I understand it correctly, the reason Google doesn't want libgcc_s.so > is Google believes GPLv3 exception only applies to libgcc,a and libgcc_eh,a, > not libgcc_s.so. If GPLv3 exception also applies to libgcc_s.so, Google > may consider using libgcc_s.so.
It's an internal process thing. We're not worried about licensing in this context. Ollie
