On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:57:48 +0000, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > However, duplicating the instructions and inverting operand order seems > to defeat the purpose of '%'. So, what's the catch? Or is it a genuine > bug?
I just understood my miss understanding above. '%' is part of constraints which as far as I know is only taken into account by the ira/reload stuff, etc. Combine doesn't look at it and therefore misses this information. Now, is there any way to hint at combine that ior is commutative without having more permissive predicates? -- PMatos
