On 02/10/2012 10:07 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > The issue with libm in glibc here is that Drepper absolutely does > not want new ABIs in libm - he believes that for example vectorized > routines do not belong there (nor the SSE calling-convention variants > for i686 I tried to push once).
That's a good reason why we can't do this in glibc. I accept the point; it'll have to be GNU libm. Andrew.
