On 8 February 2012 13:06, Andrew MacLeod <amacl...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/08/2012 05:54 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely<jwakely....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Should they be? >> >> Yes. Esp. also the deprecation of the __sync builtins. > > Yes, I meant to do that last week, but instead it's this week :-P Gerald > had pinged me about it a while ago.
Great, thanks - I was thinking about adding a line to the C++11 improvements in the libstdc++ section mentioning the new implementation of <atomic>, do you think it's worth it?
