On 10/10/2011 08:07 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > PODness has changed from C++98.
Jason Merrill wrote: > Class layout in the ABI still uses the C++98 definition of POD. But does this actually matter? If I understand correctly, more classes are POD under the C++11 rules than the C++98 rules, but are there any classes that are legal C++98 that require a different layout under the new rules? Can anyone produce an example of a real (and not a theoretical) binary incompatibility?
