On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:24 PM, James Y Knight <f...@fuhm.net> wrote:
> I guess to start, it would have been nice if there was a big warning on > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html telling me not to use c++0x mode > unless there are no objects compiled with c++98 linked into the same > executable. Gabriel Dos Reis [g...@integrable-solutions.net] wrote: > I was under the impression c++0x was explicitly documented as experimental. Yes. But I hope that some thought is devoted to figuring out how this problem can be dealt with when c++11 support is transitioned to a fully supported feature. Eventually there would need to be one libstdc++ that programs link against and run whether they use c++98 or c++11. I would expect there to be restrictions, but it's a problem that eventually needs to be tackled.
