On 20 December 2011 12:49, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > The point of the example is that you cannot write > > if (__builtin_expect (ptr, 1)) > error (); > > so the "!= NULL" is important here. But you are right that > "error ()" is a bit unexpected; care to send a patch that changes > it to e.g. "do_something ()"?
or even ptr->do_something() since that would depend on the value of ptr
