-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/07/11 01:19, David Brown wrote:
> > Would it be possible then to have switches for different levels, > such as is done with the strict aliasing warnings? Well, there's two obvious levels... Not sure if there's a good way to get something in between. > Do people often intentionally run gcc without any optimisations > these days? Certainly. Compile speed and debugging being the primary reasons. However, as was mentioned we're always going into SSA (as a result of the SSA->RTL expansion path), so that issue is gone. >> > > In my opinion, we should nuke -Wall - these warning options should > all be enabled unless explicitly /disabled/ with the -W options. > And -Werror should be enabled by default too. Just think how many > bugs would be found in existing software if developers were pushed > into using their tools effectively! Well, lots of folks would disagree with that suggestion. And that's the root of the problem with this kind of issue -- different developers have different needs. Any significant change we make in this space is probably going to make equal numbers of developers happy and mad at the same time. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO36rjAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7VbgIAIUBoB5BoQnP8EcPsak0h3A/ h5KgxrcQIji2tPDthshbXbL9vVf0PpLzn6SFC4ZUt37sMQu5CLNqyqfMgpHgukic zTumkTZRlbVxt9/UVE/NDNN3DQtyzOE4QBj7a9Bp7kYDZEVEhCHFFyvSurv+1JJa jixT3+okGZSsuhFzeSWiNo8s3mqAaZ+FAmDhsv95Z1y13nOw4WDPqynnUmGZ76ri TBPUCtqOuJ69ZOVmzdsudw9o9BDuBTCQ2rgljVrbkT+fKlxyVuuiRmdWAte/7D21 u2EsuqMvEpYucX/2mBL/FoAi6T4LsEGxEJPzJS6p0cEbQFZXbygpP+RZtkRmbYI= =nE95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
