On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > Is it possible to make sure that the "LABELX" occurs right > after the "Call some_function" instruction (and the instruction > scheduler moves the label with the call INSN)? I insert the > label right after the call is expanded and LABELX is being moved > above the Call instruction by the schedule_insns function.
Is emitting the label in port-specific code together with the call insn (trigged by a punctuation like "%&" for i386) not an option? brgds, H-P
