From: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:22:51 +0100
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:41:08PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> --- a/libgcc/configure.ac
>> +++ b/libgcc/configure.ac
>> @@ -255,11 +255,12 @@ AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether assembler supports CFI
>> directives], [libgcc_cv_cfi],
>> [libgcc_cv_cfi=yes],
>> [libgcc_cv_cfi=no])])
>>
>> -# Check 32bit or 64bit for x86.
>> +# Check 32bit or 64bit for x86 and sparc.
>> case ${host} in
>> -i?86*-*-* | x86_64*-*-*)
>> +i?86*-*-* | x86_64*-*-* | sparc*-*-*)
>> cat > conftest.c <<EOF
>> -#ifdef __x86_64__
>> +#if defined(__x86_64__) || \
>> + (defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__))
>> host_address=64
>> #else
>> host_address=32
>
> I think much better would be to handle sparc*/s390*/powerpc* differently
> here, just using #ifdef __LP64__ test. i?86/x86_64 is different because
> of the third weirdo multilib option.
Yes, using __LP64__ for non-x86 is much better. Then we can completely
remove the ${host} conditional and nobody will have to hack on this
piece of configure code ever again.
I'll try to find time ot hack this together if nobody beats me to it.
